On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:23:28 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 9:24 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:17:09 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:54 PM SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:46:54 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:44 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This commit introduces a reference implementation of the address space
> > > > > > specific low level primitives for the virtual address space, so that
> > > > > > users of DAMON can easily monitor the data accesses on virtual address
> > > > > > spaces of specific processes by simply configuring the implementation to
> > > > > > be used by DAMON.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The low level primitives for the fundamental access monitoring are
> > > > > > defined in two parts:
> > > > > > 1. Identification of the monitoring target address range for the address
> > > > > > space.
> > > > > > 2. Access check of specific address range in the target space.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The reference implementation for the virtual address space provided by
> > > > > > this commit is designed as below.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PTE Accessed-bit Based Access Check
> > > > > > -----------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The implementation uses PTE Accessed-bit for basic access checks. That
> > > > > > is, it clears the bit for next sampling target page and checks whether
> > > > > > it set again after one sampling period. To avoid disturbing other
> > > > > > Accessed bit users such as the reclamation logic, the implementation
> > > > > > adjusts the ``PG_Idle`` and ``PG_Young`` appropriately, as same to the
> > > > > > 'Idle Page Tracking'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > VMA-based Target Address Range Construction
> > > > > > -------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only small parts in the super-huge virtual address space of the
> > > > > > processes are mapped to physical memory and accessed. Thus, tracking
> > > > > > the unmapped address regions is just wasteful. However, because DAMON
> > > > > > can deal with some level of noise using the adaptive regions adjustment
> > > > > > mechanism, tracking every mapping is not strictly required but could
> > > > > > even incur a high overhead in some cases. That said, too huge unmapped
> > > > > > areas inside the monitoring target should be removed to not take the
> > > > > > time for the adaptive mechanism.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the reason, this implementation converts the complex mappings to
> > > > > > three distinct regions that cover every mapped area of the address
> > > > > > space. Also, the two gaps between the three regions are the two biggest
> > > > > > unmapped areas in the given address space. The two biggest unmapped
> > > > > > areas would be the gap between the heap and the uppermost mmap()-ed
> > > > > > region, and the gap between the lowermost mmap()-ed region and the stack
> > > > > > in most of the cases. Because these gaps are exceptionally huge in
> > > > > > usual address spacees, excluding these will be sufficient to make a
> > > > > > reasonable trade-off. Below shows this in detail::
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <heap>
> > > > > > <BIG UNMAPPED REGION 1>
> > > > > > <uppermost mmap()-ed region>
> > > > > > (small mmap()-ed regions and munmap()-ed regions)
> > > > > > <lowermost mmap()-ed region>
> > > > > > <BIG UNMAPPED REGION 2>
> > > > > > <stack>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Leonard Foerster <foersleo@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > [snip]
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static void damon_mkold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + pte_t *pte = NULL;
> > > > > > + pmd_t *pmd = NULL;
> > > > > > + spinlock_t *ptl;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (follow_pte_pmd(mm, addr, NULL, &pte, &pmd, &ptl))
> > > > > > + return;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (pte) {
> > > > > > + if (pte_young(*pte)) {
> > > > >
> > > > > Any reason for skipping mmu_notifier_clear_young()? Why exclude VMs as
> > > > > DAMON's target applications?
> > > >
> > > > Obviously my mistake, thank you for pointing this! I will add the function
> > > > call in the next spin.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Similarly mmu_notifier_test_young() for the damon_young().
> >
> > Yes, indeed. Thanks for pointing this, either :)
> >
> > > BTW I think we can combine ctx->prepare_access_checks() and
> > > ctx->check_accesses() into one i.e. get the young state for the previous
> > > cycle and mkold for the next cycle in a single step.
> >
> > Yes, we could. But, I'm unsure what is the advantage of doing that. First of
> > all, if the combined implementation is required, peopld could simply implement
> > the two logics in the combined way in one of the callbacks and leave the other
> > one blank. Also, I'm worrying if combining those could make the code a little
> > bit hard to read. IMHO, I think separating those makes the 'kdamond_fn()' code
> > little bit easier to read. Actually, I started from the combined approach but
> > separated the two logics since v7 after Jonathan's comment[1].
> >
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200310085721.00000a0f@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I am wondering if there is any advantage to having "Page Idle
> > > Tracking" beside DAMON. I think we can make them mutually exclusive.
> > > Once we have established that I think DAMON can steal the two page
> > > flag bits from it and can make use of them. What do you think?
> >
> > Again, yes, I think we could. But I don't see clear advantage of it for now.
> >
> >
>
> Hmm, I will think more about it. Somehow I feel if we want to monitor
> at the page sized region granularity then this will be really helpful.
> Anyways, it needs more brainstorming.
Ok, I will also think about it from the perspective.
>
> BTW I am still going over the series and my humble request would be to
> wait till I have gone through the series completely and provided the
> feedback then you can send the next version after incorporating the
> feedback.
No problem, just let me know when you finished. Appreciate your review :)
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
>
> Shakeel
>
