On 08/07/2020 09:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> index f4a01305d9a6..a63a411a74d5 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h >> @@ -857,9 +857,11 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_openat2, sys_openat2) >> __SYSCALL(__NR_pidfd_getfd, sys_pidfd_getfd) >> #define __NR_faccessat2 439 >> __SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat2, sys_faccessat2) >> +#define __NR_landlock 440 >> +__SYSCALL(__NR_landlock, sys_landlock) >> >> #undef __NR_syscalls >> -#define __NR_syscalls 440 >> +#define __NR_syscalls 441 > > In linux-next, we already have: > > +#define __NR_watch_mount 440 > +#define __NR_watch_sb 441 > +#define __NR_fsinfo 442 > +#define __NR_process_madvise 443 > > You may want to increase the number again. > > Arnd > OK, I'll rebase the next series on linux-next. Do you know if there is other syscalls on their way to linux-next? Are the other parts of arch/syscall OK for you?
