On 29-06-20, 10:44, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Monday 29 Jun 2020 at 13:55:00 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > static int __init cpufreq_core_init(void)
> > {
> > + struct cpufreq_governor *gov = cpufreq_default_governor();
> > +
> > if (cpufreq_disabled())
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > cpufreq_global_kobject = kobject_create_and_add("cpufreq", &cpu_subsys.dev_root->kobj);
> > BUG_ON(!cpufreq_global_kobject);
> >
> > + if (!strlen(default_governor))
>
> Should we test '!strlen(default_governor) && gov' here actually?
> We check the return value of cpufreq_default_governor() in
> cpufreq_init_policy(), so I'm guessing we should do the same here to be
> on the safe side.
With the current setup (the Kconfig option being a choice which
selects one governor at least), it is not possible for gov to be NULL
here. And so I didn't worry about it :)
--
viresh
