On Monday 29 Jun 2020 at 07:38:43 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 26-06-20, 16:57, Quentin Perret wrote: > > Do we need both cpufreq_param_governor and default_governor? > > Could we move everything to only one of them? Something a little bit > > like that maybe? > > No because we want to fallback to the default governor when the > governor shown by the cpufreq_param_governor is valid but missing. But that would still work with my suggestion no? You still fallback to calling cpufreq_default_governor() in cpufreq_init_policy() if get_governor(default_governor) doesn't succeed, so we should be covered. Thanks, Quentin
