On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:11:06 -0700 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Someone already sent out a fix for this: > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-doc/52f851cb5c9fd2ecae97deec7e168e66b8c295c3.1591137229.git.mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Is it intentional that you're sending out a different fix rather than applying > that one? It wasn't, actually, I'm just finding myself more than usually challenged these days. That said, removing the table entirely seems ... excessive. It's not terrible the way it is, or we could make it: test_dummy_encryption[=%s] if we really want to. jon
