[PATCH RESEND 1/4] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>From f9aa6cde74b95cdaae67d484504c3dd69e8bc205 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 13:37:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/4] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt

The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below.
Fix the name of litmus test.

Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
index 7fe8d7aa3029..63c4adfed884 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by
 locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock.
 Consider this example:
 
-	/* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */
+	/* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */
 	void CPU0(void)
 	{
 		spin_lock(&mylock);
-- 
2.17.1





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux