>From f9aa6cde74b95cdaae67d484504c3dd69e8bc205 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 13:37:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/4] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt
The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below.
Fix the name of litmus test.
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
index 7fe8d7aa3029..63c4adfed884 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by
locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock.
Consider this example:
- /* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */
+ /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
--
2.17.1
