On Mon, 11 May 2020, Joel Fernandes wrote: > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 22:06:46 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] docs: litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU pre-initialization > test > > Since this test was moved to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is > at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/litmus-tests/README | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/litmus-tests/README b/Documentation/litmus-tests/README > index ac0b270b456c1..53f09e74734a4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/litmus-tests/README > +++ b/Documentation/litmus-tests/README > @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ tools/memory-model/README. > > atomic (/atomic derectory) > -------------------------- > - > Atomic-RMW+mb__after_atomic-is-stronger-than-acquire.litmus > Test that an atomic RMW followed by a smp_mb__after_atomic() is > stronger than a normal acquire: both the read and write parts of > @@ -23,8 +22,11 @@ Atomic-RMW-ops-are-atomic-WRT-atomic_set.litmus > > RCU (/rcu directory) > -------------------- > - > RCU+sync+read.litmus > RCU+sync+free.litmus > Both the above litmus tests demonstrate the RCU grace period guarantee > that an RCU read-side critical section can never span a grace period. > + > +MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus (moved to tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/) > + Demonstrates that rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() to > + ensure that an RCU reader will not see pre-initialization garbage. The grammar in this sentence is awful. Should the first "that" be changed to "the use of"? Alan
