Re: [PATCH 0/3] tools/memory-model, Documentation/litmus-test: Sort out location of litmus test and README

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 04:21:02PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2020 12:43:30 +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> > 
> > Sorry for the late response but I've noticed some glitches.
> >  
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:57:32 -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> >> Move MP+onceassign+derefonce to the new Documentation/litmus-tests/rcu/
> >> directory.
> > 
> > MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus is called out in
> > tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt as a representative example
> > of RCU related litmus test.
> > 
> > So I think it should be kept under tools/memory-model/litmus-tests.
> > 
> > Further RCU-related litmus tests can be added under Documentation/litmus-tests/.
> > 
> > IIUC, this change is not picked up by tip tree yet. So we have time to respin
> > the series targeting v5.9.
> > 
> >>
> >> More RCU-related litmus tests would be added here.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Cc: vpillai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>  Documentation/litmus-tests/README                        | 9 +++++++++
> > 
> > Please note that later patches to add atomic litmus tests under
> > Documentation/litmus-tests/ by Boqun put README as
> > Documentation/litums-tests/atomic/README.
> > 
> > This patch's location of RCU's README as Documentation/litmus-tests/README
> > looks asymmetric to me.
> > 
> > I'm OK with either merging atomic's README with the top-level one or
> > moving RCU's README to under Documentation/litmus-tests/rcu.
> > 
> > Joel, Boqum, can you sort out the location of README?
> 
> So something like this?
> 
> Patch 1/3 is an independent typo fix in recipes.txt.
> Patch 2/3 reverts the MP+onceassign+derefonce relocation.
> Patch 3/3 merges atomic's README into the top-level one.
> 
> This is relative to -rcu's lkmm branch.
> 
> Thoughts?

Looks plausible to me, and thank you for reviewing this.

Joel, thoughts?

							Thanx, Paul

>         Thanks, Akira
> --
> Akira Yokosawa (3):
>   tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt
>   Revert "Documentation: LKMM: Move MP+onceassign+derefonce to new
>     litmus-tests/rcu/"
>   Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into top-level one
> 
>  Documentation/litmus-tests/README             | 22 ++++++++++++++++---
>  Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README      | 16 --------------
>  tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt  |  2 +-
>  .../MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus            |  0
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README        |  3 +++
>  5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README
>  rename {Documentation/litmus-tests/rcu => tools/memory-model/litmus-tests}/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus (100%)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux