On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:01:28 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > So I'm happy to merge this set, but there is one thing that worries me a > bit... > > > fs/cachefiles/Kconfig | 4 +- > > fs/coda/Kconfig | 2 +- > > fs/configfs/inode.c | 2 +- > > fs/configfs/item.c | 2 +- > > fs/fscache/Kconfig | 8 +- > > fs/fscache/cache.c | 8 +- > > fs/fscache/cookie.c | 2 +- > > fs/fscache/object.c | 4 +- > > fs/fscache/operation.c | 2 +- > > fs/locks.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/configfs.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/fs_context.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/fscache-cache.h | 4 +- > > include/linux/fscache.h | 42 +- > > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 2 +- > > I'd feel a bit better if I could get an ack or two from filesystem folks > before I venture that far out of my own yard...what say you all? It's been another week and nobody has complained, so I'm taking that as assent; the series has been applied. Thanks, jon
