On 2020/03/14 12:12, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 02:23:37PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: >> Kees / Testsuo, are you OK with this patch once I resend with the >> suggestions you gave me? > > I think so, yes. Send a v2 (to akpm with us in CC). > >> Is there anybody else I should loop in the patch that should take a >> look? Never sent sysctl stuff before, sorry if I forgot somebody heheh > > akpm usually takes these kinds of things. > Well, maybe sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace = 1 by default is better for compatibility? Please CC or BCC kernel-testing people so that they can add hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace=1 kernel command line parameter to their testing environments if sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace = 0 by default.
