On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:48:55PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > And I completely agree that we should at least rename tsk to me. > Just for clarity. I think it wouldn't hurt to add comments to spell it out explicitly in each of the tsk->me functions, something like: /* * The "me" task_struct argument here must only ever refer to "current", * but it gets passed in to avoid re-calculating "current" in each helper. */ I've found that the exec code in its entirety would be better off with more comments. :) Usually that's the bulk of what I find myself adding when I make changes in this area. ;) -Kees -- Kees Cook