> If you think you have "any more" update candidates, feel free to make > an update "patch" and send to us. I pointed a few change possibilities out already. > That will be the next step. I got the impression that we are in the process of constructing another patch together which will fix known wording weaknesses. By the way: I wonder about the shown version identifier. Will the patch numbering need also further considerations? >> … >>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst >> … >>> +If you think that kernel/init options become too long to write in boot-loader >>> +configuration file or you want to comment on each option, the boot >>> +configuration may be suitable. … >> >> Would you like to specify any settings in the boot configuration file >> because the provided storage capacity would be too limited by the kernel command line? > > Yes. How will affected places be improved after such an agreement? Regards, Markus
