On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:34 AM Luke Nelson <lukenels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:02 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > -BPF JIT for RISC-V (RV64G) > > > +BPF JIT for 32-bit RISC-V (RV32G) > > > +M: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@xxxxxxxxx> > > > +M: Xi Wang <xi.wang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > +L: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > +S: Maintained > > > +F: arch/riscv/net/ > > > +X: arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > > > + > > > +BPF JIT for 64-bit RISC-V (RV64G) > > > M: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> > > > -L: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > +L: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > S: Maintained > > > F: arch/riscv/net/ > > > +X: arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c > > > > Obviously this breaks an order. Please, fix. > > Hint: run parse-maintainers.pl after the change. > Thanks for the comment! > > I'll change the entry names in v5 to be "BPF JIT for RISC-V (32-bit)" > and "BPF JIT for RISC-V (64-bit)", similar to the x86 JIT entries. > This will pass parse-maintainers.pl and the entries are still in > order. Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
