[PATCH 5/9] docs: gpio: driver.rst: don't mark literal blocks twice

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Two literal blocks there are marked with both "::" and

	.. code-block:: c

This causes Sphinx (2.4.1) to do the wrong thing, causing
lots of warnings:

    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:425: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:423: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:427: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:429: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:429: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:429: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:433: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:446: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:440: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:440: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:447: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:449: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:462: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:460: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:462: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:465: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:467: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:467: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:467: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:471: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst:478: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
index 871922529332..9809f593c0ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ The preferred way to set up the helpers is to fill in the
 struct gpio_irq_chip inside struct gpio_chip before adding the gpio_chip.
 If you do this, the additional irq_chip will be set up by gpiolib at the
 same time as setting up the rest of the GPIO functionality. The following
-is a typical example of a cascaded interrupt handler using gpio_irq_chip::
+is a typical example of a cascaded interrupt handler using gpio_irq_chip:
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ is a typical example of a cascaded interrupt handler using gpio_irq_chip::
   return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &g->gc, g);
 
 The helper support using hierarchical interrupt controllers as well.
-In this case the typical set-up will look like this::
+In this case the typical set-up will look like this:
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
-- 
2.24.1