>>> +Also, some subsystem may depend on the boot configuration, and it has own >>> +root key. >> >> Would you like to explain the influence of a key hierarchy any further? > > Please read the example (boot time tracer) carefully :) I find the descriptions still too terse for corresponding relationships. >> * Can such system limits become more configurable? > > No. The possibility remains to adjust the source code also for special needs. >>> +(Note: Each key consists of words separated by dot, and value also consists >>> +of values separated by comma. Here, each word and each value is generally >>> +called a "node".) >> >> I would prefer the interpretation that nodes contain corresponding attributes. > > No. Node is a node. It is merely generic. I hope that the applied ontology will be clarified a bit more. >> How do you think about to add a link to a formal file format description? > > Oh, nice idea. Please contribute it :) Did you provide it (according to a RST include directive in the subsequent update step)? Can it be helpful to reorder any changes for the discussed patch series? Regards, Markus