Re: [PATCH] docs: sysctl/kernel: document BPF entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:50 AM Stephen Kitt <steve@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:44:31 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:18 AM Stephen Kitt <steve@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > @@ -1152,6 +1166,16 @@ NMI switch that most IA32 servers have fires
> > > unknown NMI up, for example.  If a system hangs up, try pressing the NMI
> > > switch.
> > >
> > >
> > > +unprivileged_bpf_disabled
> > > +=========================
> > > +
> > > +Writing 1 to this entry will disabled unprivileged calls to ``bpf()``;
> >
> > 'will disable' ?
>
> Indeed, thanks.
>
> > It doesn't apply to bpf-next with:
> > error: sha1 information is lacking or useless
> > (Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst).
> > error: could not build fake ancestor
> > Patch failed at 0001 docs: sysctl/kernel: Document BPF entries
>
> Sorry, I forgot to include the base commit information; this is against
> 8f21f54b8a95 in docs-next.
>
> I’ll wait for that to make it to Linus’ tree and re-submit the patch (with
> the fix above).

Please use bpf-next tree as a base for your patch.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux