On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:00:23 +0100 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote: > >>> +Currently the maximum config size size is 32KB … > >> > >> Would you like to avoid a word duplication here? > > > > Oops, still exist. > > Is there a need to separate the number from the following unit? Sorry, I couldn't understand what you pointed here. Would you mean the number of file size and nodes? > > Indeed, "node" is not well defined. What about this? > > --- > > Each key consists of words separated by dot, and value also consists of > > values separated by comma. Here, each word and each value is generally > > called a "node". > > I have got still understanding difficulties with such an interpretation. > > * Do other contributors find an other word also more appropriate for this use case? No. > * How will the influence evolve for naming these items? Node is used in its API, but from the user's point of view, I think it is OK to use "key-word" and "value". Also, since it is hard to count those numbers by manual, I think user can depend on tools/bootconfig which shows the number of node in the configuration file now. > * Is each element just a string (according to specific rules)? Yes. > >> Could an other wording be nicer than the abbreviation “a doc for … config” > >> in the commit subject? > > > > OK, I'll try next time. > > Will words like “descriptions”and “configuration”be helpful? Like "descriptions of ..." ? Thank you, > > Regards, > Markus -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
