On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:45:58PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Wed 2020-02-19 14:56:32, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: ... > Sigh, I should have been more strict[*]. The function should have been > called err_ptr() and located right below null_pointer(). But taking above into consideration it should be rather error_pointer(). No? > [*] I am still trying to find a right balance between preventing > nitpicking, bikeshedding, enforcing my style, and creating a mess. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
