Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation less UML-specific

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation less UML-specific
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:32:31 +0100
Cc: brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx, skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx, Tim.Bird@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200214235723.254228-1-davidgow@google.com>
References: <20200214235723.254228-1-davidgow@google.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:57:23PM -0800, David Gow wrote:
[...]
> +To make running these tests (and reading the results) easier, KUnit offsers

There's a typo here: s/offsers/offers/


Thanks,
Jonathan Neuschäfer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH v3] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation less UML-specific
  - From: David Gow

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add boot interrupt quirk mechanism for Xeon chipsets
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] tools/memory-model: Add litmus tests for atomic APIs
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation less UML-specific
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux