On 30/01/2020 15:49, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > Okay, I'll add this as a separate patch to the series and put you as > author. That is if you want me to tie this check to this usecase that > proves its usefulness. Otherwise it can stand on its own as well if > you want to submit it separately. > It's pretty much standalone, but it does make sense to bundle it with this series, I think. Feel free to grab ownership (I didn't test it) ;) > In regards to the ratio computation for frequency invariance where this > plays a role, I'll do a check and bail out if the ratio is 0, which I'm > ashamed to not have added before :). That does sound like something we very much want to have. > > Thanks, > Ionela. > > >>> Long story short, we're probably fine, but it would nice to shove some of >>> the above into comments (especially the SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE² trick) >>>
