Re: [PATCH 22/26] docs: i2c: instantiating-devices: use monospace for filenames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun,  5 Jan 2020 23:50:08 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Use a monospace (literal) formatting for better readability of filenames.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices.rst | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices.rst b/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices.rst
> index cbcafb36b417..f06d44c5b692 100644
> --- a/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices.rst
> @@ -224,15 +224,15 @@ In general, the kernel should know which I2C devices are connected and
>  what addresses they live at. However, in certain cases, it does not, so a
>  sysfs interface was added to let the user provide the information. This
>  interface is made of 2 attribute files which are created in every I2C bus
> -directory: new_device and delete_device. Both files are write only and you
> -must write the right parameters to them in order to properly instantiate,
> -respectively delete, an I2C device.
> +directory: ``new_device`` and ``delete_device``. Both files are write
> +only and you must write the right parameters to them in order to properly
> +instantiate, respectively delete, an I2C device.
>  
> -File new_device takes 2 parameters: the name of the I2C device (a string)
> -and the address of the I2C device (a number, typically expressed in
> -hexadecimal starting with 0x, but can also be expressed in decimal.)
> +File ``new_device`` takes 2 parameters: the name of the I2C device (a
> +string) and the address of the I2C device (a number, typically expressed
> +in hexadecimal starting with 0x, but can also be expressed in decimal.)
>  
> -File delete_device takes a single parameter: the address of the I2C
> +File ``delete_device`` takes a single parameter: the address of the I2C
>  device. As no two devices can live at the same address on a given I2C
>  segment, the address is sufficient to uniquely identify the device to be
>  deleted.

Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux