On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 08:49:05 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Some of the section names are not very clear. Reading those names in the > index.rst page does not help much in grasping what the content is supposed > to be. > > Rename those sections to clarify their content, especially when reading > the index page. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Note: here checkpatch complains: > > WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 > > Thas's because those files have no license line. I would gladly add a > proper license line, but what it the correct license here? Should I ask the > authors? GPLv2-only as the kernel default? > > I'd appreciate a guidance here, thanks in advance. I don't think we need a license for such documentation files, so I would just ignore checkpatch. > --- > Documentation/i2c/dev-interface.rst | 6 +++--- > Documentation/i2c/i2c-protocol.rst | 6 +++--- > Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 6 +++--- > Documentation/i2c/old-module-parameters.rst | 6 +++--- > Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst | 6 +++--- > Documentation/i2c/summary.rst | 6 +++--- > Documentation/i2c/writing-clients.rst | 6 +++--- > 7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > (...) > diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst > index fc69d9567d9d..ae3bbb9fd8f1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst > +++ b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > -============= > -I2C and SMBus > -============= > +============================== > +Introductions to I2C and SMBus > +============================== I would use "Introduction", singular. > > I²C (pronounce: I squared C and written I2C in the kernel documentation) is > a protocol developed by Philips. It is a slow two-wire protocol (variable > (...) Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support