Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: arm64: Support the VCPU preemption check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/12/2019 13:58, Zengruan Ye wrote:
Support the vcpu_is_preempted() functionality under KVM/arm64. This will
enhance lock performance on overcommitted hosts (more runnable VCPUs
than physical CPUs in the system) as doing busy waits for preempted
VCPUs will hurt system performance far worse than early yielding.

unix benchmark result:
   host:  kernel 5.5.0-rc1, HiSilicon Kunpeng920, 8 CPUs
   guest: kernel 5.5.0-rc1, 16 VCPUs

                test-case                |    after-patch    |   before-patch
----------------------------------------+-------------------+------------------
  Dhrystone 2 using register variables   | 334600751.0 lps   | 335319028.3 lps
  Double-Precision Whetstone             |     32856.1 MWIPS |     32849.6 MWIPS
  Execl Throughput                       |      3662.1 lps   |      2718.0 lps
  File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  |    432906.4 KBps  |    158011.8 KBps
  File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks    |    116023.0 KBps  |     37664.0 KBps
  File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  |   1432769.8 KBps  |    441108.8 KBps
  Pipe Throughput                        |   6405029.6 lps   |   6021457.6 lps
  Pipe-based Context Switching           |    185872.7 lps   |    184255.3 lps
  Process Creation                       |      4025.7 lps   |      3706.6 lps
  Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)           |      6745.6 lpm   |      6436.1 lpm
  Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)           |       998.7 lpm   |       931.1 lpm
  System Call Overhead                   |   3913363.1 lps   |   3883287.8 lps
----------------------------------------+-------------------+------------------
  System Benchmarks Index Score          |      1835.1       |      1327.6

Signed-off-by: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h |   3 +
  arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c      | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c         |   2 +
  include/linux/cpuhotplug.h        |   1 +
  4 files changed, 123 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
index 7b1c81b544bb..ca3a2c7881f3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ static inline u64 paravirt_steal_clock(int cpu)
int __init pv_time_init(void); +int __init pv_lock_init(void);
+
  __visible bool __native_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu);
static inline bool pv_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
@@ -39,6 +41,7 @@ static inline bool pv_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
  #else
#define pv_time_init() do {} while (0)
+#define pv_lock_init() do {} while (0)
#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
index d8f1ba8c22ce..bd2ad6a17a26 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
  #include <asm/pvclock-abi.h>
  #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
+#include <asm/pvlock-abi.h>
struct static_key paravirt_steal_enabled;
  struct static_key paravirt_steal_rq_enabled;
@@ -35,6 +36,10 @@ struct pv_time_stolen_time_region {
  	struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time *kaddr;
  };
+struct pv_lock_state_region {
+	struct pvlock_vcpu_state *kaddr;
+};
+
  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pv_time_stolen_time_region, stolen_time_region);
static bool steal_acc = true;
@@ -158,3 +163,115 @@ int __init pv_time_init(void)
return 0;
  }
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pv_lock_state_region, lock_state_region);
+
+static bool kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
+{
+	struct pv_lock_state_region *reg;
+	__le64 preempted_le;
+
+	reg = per_cpu_ptr(&lock_state_region, cpu);
+	if (!reg->kaddr) {
+		pr_warn_once("PV lock enabled but not configured for cpu %d\n",
+			     cpu);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	preempted_le = le64_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(reg->kaddr->preempted));
+
+	return !!(preempted_le & 1);

According to the documentation preempted != 0 means preempted, but here you are checking the LSB. You need to be consistent about the ABI.

+}
+
+static int pvlock_vcpu_state_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct pv_lock_state_region *reg;
+
+	reg = this_cpu_ptr(&lock_state_region);
+	if (!reg->kaddr)
+		return 0;
+
+	memunmap(reg->kaddr);
+	memset(reg, 0, sizeof(*reg));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int init_pvlock_vcpu_state(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct pv_lock_state_region *reg;
+	struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+	reg = this_cpu_ptr(&lock_state_region);
+
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED, &res);
+
+	if (res.a0 == SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
+		pr_warn("Failed to init PV lock data structure\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	reg->kaddr = memremap(res.a0,
+			      sizeof(struct pvlock_vcpu_state),
+			      MEMREMAP_WB);
+
+	if (!reg->kaddr) {
+		pr_warn("Failed to map PV lock data structure\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int kvm_arm_init_pvlock(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ARM_KVM_PVLOCK_STARTING,
+				"hypervisor/arm/pvlock:starting",
+				init_pvlock_vcpu_state,
+				pvlock_vcpu_state_dying_cpu);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		pr_warn("PV-lock init failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool has_kvm_pvlock(void)
+{
+	struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+	/* To detect the presence of PV lock support we require SMCCC 1.1+ */
+	if (psci_ops.smccc_version < SMCCC_VERSION_1_1)
+		return false;
+
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+			     ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_LOCK_FEATURES, &res);

As mentioned previously we could do with something more robust to check that the hypervisor is actually KVM before assuming that vendor specific IDs are valid.

Steve

+
+	if (res.a0 != SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+int __init pv_lock_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (is_hyp_mode_available())
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!has_kvm_pvlock())
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = kvm_arm_init_pvlock();
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	pv_ops.lock.vcpu_is_preempted = kvm_vcpu_is_preempted;
+	pr_info("using PV-lock preempted\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index 56f664561754..aa3a8b9e710f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
  	smp_init_cpus();
  	smp_build_mpidr_hash();
+ pv_lock_init();
+
  	/* Init percpu seeds for random tags after cpus are set up. */
  	kasan_init_tags();
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
index e51ee772b9f5..f72ff95ab63a 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
  	CPUHP_AP_DUMMY_TIMER_STARTING,
  	CPUHP_AP_ARM_XEN_STARTING,
  	CPUHP_AP_ARM_KVMPV_STARTING,
+	CPUHP_AP_ARM_KVM_PVLOCK_STARTING,
  	CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING,
  	CPUHP_AP_ARM64_ISNDEP_STARTING,
  	CPUHP_AP_SMPCFD_DYING,






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux