> hmm, maybe we could add some kinda-OOP-style metadata into the type documentation ? I hope so. > Or maybe extend doxygen to crossref types vs functions operating on them. An advanced cross-reference variant would be nice (besides the “Elixir”). >>> It seems that no customised attributes are supported at the moment. >>> Thus I imagine to specify helpful annotations as macros. > > Do you mean _attribute__(...) or comments ? I propose to encode helpful information into macro calls as needed for the C programming language. > I guess he's thinking about some kind of meta-language for expressing > common things we know from oop-world, like ctors, dtors, getters, etc. This feedback fits also to my imaginations for a better taxonomy. Regards, Markus
