On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:51PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx > > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> > > Hi SeongJae, > > The patch looks fine, but I am not sure if this change is required. > What do you think Paul? Thank you, Madhuparna! This change might not be absolutely required, but it is a good change. SeongJae, could you please include Madhuparna's pair of Reviewed-by tags and also make your email address consistent in your next posting? You currently have both sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx and sjpark@xxxxxxxxx. Either is fine. ;-) Thanx, Paul > Thanks, > Madhuparna > > --- > Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst > index 2a830c51477e..0e03c6ef3147 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Frequently Asked Questions > Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the > others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL. > There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU > - available (http://liburcu.org/). > + available (https://liburcu.org/). > > - I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels? > > -- > 2.17.1 > >
