Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] Documentation/arm64: Fix a simple typo in memory.rst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:55:14AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Fix a simple typo in arm64/memory.rst
> 
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/arm64/memory.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst b/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst
> index 02e02175e6f5..cf03b3290800 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ this logic.
>  
>  As a single binary will need to support both 48-bit and 52-bit VA
>  spaces, the VMEMMAP must be sized large enough for 52-bit VAs and
> -also must be sized large enought to accommodate a fixed PAGE_OFFSET.
> +also must be sized large enough to accommodate a fixed PAGE_OFFSET.
>  
>  Most code in the kernel should not need to consider the VA_BITS, for
>  code that does need to know the VA size the variables are
> -- 

Why is this a separate patch?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux