On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 09:44:33AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:38:22PM +0100, SeongJae Park wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:08 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > But since Jon seems to be taking these in his capacity and Documentation > > > > maintainer, could you please resend CCing him? If we have these changes > > > > scattered across too many trees, someone is going to get confused, > > > > and it probably will be me. ;-) > > > > > > Agreed, CC-ing Jon to this mail. That said, this is a followup of Will's > > > patch[1] and the patch is also not queued in Jon's tree. So, I would like to > > > hear Will's opinion either, if possible. > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-10-will@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Ah, this one got caught out in the conversion from .html to .rst. > > > > I did get an ack on one of those, and thus queued it. I clearly need to > > take another look at Will's series, and thank you for the reminder! > > I was planning to include this in the next posting of my series, but I was > waiting for the merge window to close first. Now that we have -rc1, I'll > post it this week, although the patches are also queued up in my tree here > [1] (warning -- rebasing development branch). > > I'll leave the patches that are unrelated to smp_read_barrier_depends() to > Paul and Jon, unless they indicate a preference to the contrary. I don't know about Jon, but I might need a reminder as to which patches those are. ;-) Thanx, Paul > Will > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=lto
