Hello Andrey, Alexander, Dmitry,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Nick Hu wrote:
> If archs don't have memmove then the C implementation from lib/string.c is used,
> and then it's instrumented by compiler. So there is no need to add KASAN's
> memmove to manual checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hu <nickhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
If you're happy with this revision of this patch, could you please ack it
so we can merge it as part of the RISC-V KASAN patch set?
Or if you'd prefer to take this patch yourself, please let me know.
- Paul
> ---
> mm/kasan/common.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
> index 6814d6d6a023..897f9520bab3 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/common.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ void *memset(void *addr, int c, size_t len)
> return __memset(addr, c, len);
> }
>
> +#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_MEMMOVE
> #undef memmove
> void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
> {
> @@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
>
> return __memmove(dest, src, len);
> }
> +#endif
>
> #undef memcpy
> void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
> --
> 2.17.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
- Paul
