On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:36:16 +0530 Jaskaran Singh <jaskaransingh7654321@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At a bare minimum, an effort like this needs to put a big flashing > > warning > > at the top of the file. But it would be soooooo much better to > > actually > > update the content as well. > > > > The best way to do that would be to annotate the source with proper > > kerneldoc comments, then pull them into the documentation rather than > > repeating the information here. Is there any chance you might be up > > for > > taking on a task like this? > > > > > Sure! I'll send the documentation patch(es) followed by a v2 for this > patch. Great. As an alternative, if you like, redo the current patch with the other suggested fixes and a "this is obsolete" warning at the top. Then, after the subsequent improvements land, that warning can eventually be removed again. Thanks, jon
