On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 12:28:47PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 01:50, Jarkko Sakkinen > <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:04:18PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > > Isn't this statement contradicting with your earlier statement > > > regarding the right order would be to complete TEE patches review > > > first and then come up with documentation here [2]? > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1568025601.4614.253.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20190909163643.qxmzpcggi567hmhv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > With the intersecting issues, namely key generation and conflicting > > keyctl parameters, that was not a well considered statement. > > Okay, let me work on documentation first, but I think resending whole > patch-set just for documentation review and rework would be an > overkill. Would minor revisions of this patch only like v3.1, v3.2 > etc. work for you? And later I could send next version of this > patch-set once we agree on documentation. Yeah, we could iterate through the documentation patch and once we are happy with it you can bundle it to your main patch set. /Jarkko
