> *Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory to
> search SmPL scripts.
>
> *Start a corresponding file determination if it contains an acceptable
> path.
>
> *Update coccinelle.rst documents for use coccicheck with a directory
> selection
‣ Do you really insist to use an enumeration without alignment
in your change description?
‣ Can the following third item be nicer?
* Adjust software documentation for using coccicheck with
a selected directory.
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
> @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ Two other modes provide some common combinations of these modes.
…
> +Using Coccinelle with defalut value
Why did you repeat a typo?
How do you think about to use the section title “Using Coccinelle
with the default configuration”?
…
> +semantic patch. In that case, the variable must be initialized with
> +the name of the semantic patch to apply.
I prefer an other wording.
…, it should be set to the file name of the semantic patch to apply.
…
> +directory. In that case, the variable must be initialized with the name of
…, it should be set to the …
Will the presented case distinction need another adjustment
for the document outline?
…
> Controlling Which Files are Processed by Coccinelle
…
Did you overlook another update candidate (which I tried to point out before)?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=a99d8080aaf358d5d23581244e5da23b35e340b9#n189
“…
COCCI variable may additionally be used to only apply a single
semantic patch as shown in the previous section.
…”
Regards,
Markus
