On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:12:15 -0700 Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Make sure all questions are headings. Some questions are > currently on multiple lines, and the continuation lines > appear as part of the answer when rendered. One question > was also missing an underline completely. > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst | 35 +++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) Thanks for working to improve our documentation! One quick comment... [...] > -Q: I see a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -Q: Should I request it via stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx like the references in > -the kernel's Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file say? > +Q: I see a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable. Should I request it via stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx like the references in the kernel's Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file say? > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I don't think that making these massive heading lines actually improves the experience - for readers of either the plain-text or formatted docs. If you really want to create headings, the heading here should be "Stable backports" or some such with the question appearing below. But do the questions really need to be headings? Thanks, jon
