Re: [PATCH 00/12] infiniband kernel-doc fixes & driver-api/ chapter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 07:54:46AM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 10/22/2019 2:41 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 08:52:39PM -0700, rd.dunlab@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > 
> > > This patch series cleans up lots of kernel-doc in drivers/infiniband/
> > > and then adds an infiniband.rst file.
> > > 
> > > It also changes a few instances of non-exported functions from kernel-doc
> > > notation back to non-kernel-doc comments.
> > > 
> > > There are still a few kernel-doc and Sphinx warnings that I don't know how
> > > to resolve:
> > > 
> > >    ../drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h:401: warning: Function parameter or member 'all_list' not described in 'iser_fr_desc'
> > >    ../drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h:415: warning: Function parameter or member 'all_list' not described in 'iser_fr_pool'
> > 
> > Maybe Max can help?
> > 
> > >    ../drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c:2510: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> > >    ../drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c:2512: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > >    ../drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c:2544: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> > 
> > I don't know what to make of these either.
> > 
> > Anyhow, it is an overall improvement, so I applied everything but
> > 
> > [05/12] infiniband: fix ulp/opa_vnic/opa_vnic_encap.h kernel-doc notation
> 
> Safe to assume the kbuild robot failure [1] is a result of this?
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=157177785916141&w=2

Yes, just more warnings

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux