On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:28:56 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So this is a good fix, but it's not an actual patch that I can apply. > > Randy meanwhile says he fixed it, but the patch wasn't sent to me. I > > guess this warning will live a little longer...:( > > AFAIK, it's a patch to linux-next, not mainline. > Can you take such a patch? Ah, I see the problem, sorry I was dense before. The patch is fixing a change that went into linux-next via somebody else's tree. So yeah, I can't really apply that, it should go to whoever merged the original (which is 0fab3ac21880 "hung_task: allow printing warnings every check interval" BTW). A Fixes: tag and a copy to the original author would also be good. Sorry for the confusion, jon
