On Saturday, August 31, 2019 4:43:44 PM CEST Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 15:41:16 +0200 > > Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > several CPU's and you want to use spinlocks you can potentially use > > > > -cheaper versions of the spinlocks. IFF you know that the spinlocks are > > +cheaper versions of the spinlocks. If you know that the spinlocks are > > > > never used in interrupt handlers, you can use the non-irq versions:: > I suspect that was not actually a typo; "iff" is a way for the > mathematically inclined to say "if and only if". Unfortunately this thread focused on this little thing ^_^' What about the patch itself? Should I send a new one without this fix or you will apply it as it is?
