Hi! > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2019-03-11 23:31:08, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Calling this a lie is a completly unjustified personal attack on those who > > > > So how should it be called? I initally used less strong words, only to > > get "Care to tell what's a lie instead of making bold statements?" > > back. Also look at the timing of the thread. > > You called it a lie from the very beginning or what do you think made me > tell you that? Here is what you said: Actually, I still call it a lie. Document clearly says that bug is fixed in non-virtualized cases, when in fact it depends on PAE and limited memory. > If you want to provide more accurate documentation then you better come up > with something which is helpful instead of completely useless blurb like > the below: At this point I want you to fix it yourself. Lying about security bugs being fixed when they are not is not cool. I tried to be helpful and submit a patch, but I don't feel like you are cooperating on getting the patch applied. > > + Mitigation is present in kernels v4.19 and newer, and in > > + recent -stable kernels. PAE needs to be enabled for mitigation to > > + work. > > No. The mitigation is available when the kernel provides it. Numbers are > irrelevant because that documentation has to be applicable for stable > kernels as well. And what is a recent -stable kernel? > > Also the PAE part needs to go to a completely different section. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
