On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 13:51:13 +0100
Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[forgot that one]
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:50:14 +0100
> Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > +static int __init kvm_pvtime_init(void)
> > +{
> > + kvm_register_device_ops(&pvtime_ops, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PV_TIME);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +late_initcall(kvm_pvtime_init);
Why is it an initcall? So far, the only initcall we've used is the one
that initializes KVM itself. Can't we just the device_ops just like we
do for the vgic?
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
