On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:08:52 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This file has its own proper style, except that, after a while, > the coding style gets violated and whitespaces are placed on > different ways. > > As Sphinx and ReST are very sentitive to whitespace differences, > I had to opt if each entry after required/mandatory/... fields > should start with zero spaces or with a tab. I opted to start them > all from the zero position, in order to avoid needing to break lines > with more than 80 columns, with would make harder for review. > > Most of the other changes at porting.rst were made to use an unified > notation with works nice as a text file while also produce a good html > output after being parsed. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst > index 66aa521e6376..f18506083ced 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ Callers of notify_change() need ->i_mutex now. > New super_block field ``struct export_operations *s_export_op`` for > explicit support for exporting, e.g. via NFS. The structure is fully > documented at its declaration in include/linux/fs.h, and in > -Documentation/filesystems/nfs/Exporting. > +Documentation/filesystems/nfs/exporting.rst. > > Briefly it allows for the definition of decode_fh and encode_fh operations > to encode and decode filehandles, and allows the filesystem to use This patch doesn't match the changelog at all. I think it's one leftover fix after the previous version of the patch was applied...? jon
