On 07/12, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
> static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync *rsp)
> {
> - RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
> + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(),
Yes, this is what I meant.
Sorry for confusion, I should have mentioned that rcu_sync_is_idle()
was recently updated when I suggested to use the new helper.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
