On Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:23:46 AM CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > There's a wrong identation on a code block, and it tries to use > a reference that was not defined at the Italian translation. > > Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:329: WARNING: > Literal block expected; none found. > Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:332: WARNING: > Unexpected indentation. > Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:339: WARNING: > Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. > Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:341: WARNING: > Unexpected indentation. > Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst:305: WARNING: > Unknown target name: "metatags". > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../it_IT/process/license-rules.rst | 28 +++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst > b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst index > f058e06996dc..06abeb7dd307 100644 > --- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst > +++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/license-rules.rst > @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ essere categorizzate in: > LICENSES/dual > > I file in questa cartella contengono il testo completo della rispettiva > - licenza e i suoi `Metatags`_. I nomi dei file sono identici agli > + licenza e i suoi `Metatags`. I nomi dei file sono identici agli Remove 's' instead of '_' and then the link is correct `Metatag`_ > identificatori di licenza SPDX che dovrebbero essere usati nei file > sorgenti. > > @@ -326,19 +326,19 @@ essere categorizzate in: > > Esempio del formato del file:: > > - Valid-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1 > - SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/MPL-1.1.html > - Usage-Guide: > - Do NOT use. The MPL-1.1 is not GPL2 compatible. It may only be used > for - dual-licensed files where the other license is GPL2 compatible. - > If you end up using this it MUST be used together with a GPL2 > compatible - license using "OR". > - To use the Mozilla Public License version 1.1 put the following SPDX > - tag/value pair into a comment according to the placement guidelines in > - the licensing rules documentation: > - SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1 > - License-Text: > - Full license text > + Valid-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1 > + SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/MPL-1.1.html > + Usage-Guide: > + Do NOT use. The MPL-1.1 is not GPL2 compatible. It may only be used > for + dual-licensed files where the other license is GPL2 compatible. > + If you end up using this it MUST be used together with a GPL2 > compatible + license using "OR". > + To use the Mozilla Public License version 1.1 put the following SPDX > + tag/value pair into a comment according to the placement guidelines > in + the licensing rules documentation: > + SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-1.1 > + License-Text: > + Full license text