Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enable new kprobe event at boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 22 May 2019 00:39:32 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Perhaps we could enable kprobes at early init?
> 
> It should be possible, I will try to find what blocks it. I guess after we
> switch early_text_poke() to text_poke(), we can use kprobes on x86. But
> for other archs, I need to investigate more.

OK, I just follow the kernel init related to kprobes

start_kernel()
 -> trace_init()
 -> rcu_init_nohz()
 -> perf_event_init()
 -> arch_call_rest_init()
   -> rest_init()
     -> rcu_scheduler_starting()
     -> kernel_thread(kernel_init)
kernel_init()
 -> kernel_init_freeable()
   -> wait_for_completion(&kthreadd_done);
   -> workqueue_init()
   -> smp_init()
   -> do_basic_setup()
     -> do_initcalls()
       -> do_initcall_level()
         (in subsys-level)
         -> init_kprobes()

Since optprobe uses workqueue, we can not move it before workqueue_init().
(but maybe we can disable it in early stage)
Also, since kprobes depends on rcu, I guess we can not move it before
rcu_scheduler_starting().
for kretprobe, we need to get the possible cpus, we need a fix if we move
it before before smp_init().
However, there is no reason we need to run it in subsys level. We can
move init_kprobes() in core or pure level safely.


Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux