[PATCH] lib/sort.c: fix kernel-doc notation warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Fix kernel-doc notation in lib/sort.c by using correct function
parameter names.

../lib/sort.c:59: warning: Excess function parameter 'size' description in 'swap_words_32'
../lib/sort.c:83: warning: Excess function parameter 'size' description in 'swap_words_64'
../lib/sort.c:110: warning: Excess function parameter 'size' description in 'swap_bytes'

Fixes: 37d0ec34d111a ("lib/sort: make swap functions more generic")

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: George Spelvin <lkml@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch still leaves these Sphinx warnings, which appears to be
some kind of "feature."  :(

../lib/list_sort.c:128: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
../lib/list_sort.c:161: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
../lib/list_sort.c:162: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.

 lib/sort.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- lnx-52-rc1.orig/lib/sort.c
+++ lnx-52-rc1/lib/sort.c
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ static bool is_aligned(const void *base,
 
 /**
  * swap_words_32 - swap two elements in 32-bit chunks
- * @a, @b: pointers to the elements
- * @size: element size (must be a multiple of 4)
+ * @a: pointer to the first element to swap
+ * @b: pointer to the second element to swap
+ * @n: element size (must be a multiple of 4)
  *
  * Exchange the two objects in memory.  This exploits base+index addressing,
  * which basically all CPUs have, to minimize loop overhead computations.
@@ -65,8 +66,9 @@ static void swap_words_32(void *a, void
 
 /**
  * swap_words_64 - swap two elements in 64-bit chunks
- * @a, @b: pointers to the elements
- * @size: element size (must be a multiple of 8)
+ * @a: pointer to the first element to swap
+ * @b: pointer to the second element to swap
+ * @n: element size (must be a multiple of 8)
  *
  * Exchange the two objects in memory.  This exploits base+index
  * addressing, which basically all CPUs have, to minimize loop overhead
@@ -100,8 +102,9 @@ static void swap_words_64(void *a, void
 
 /**
  * swap_bytes - swap two elements a byte at a time
- * @a, @b: pointers to the elements
- * @size: element size
+ * @a: pointer to the first element to swap
+ * @b: pointer to the second element to swap
+ * @n: element size
  *
  * This is the fallback if alignment doesn't allow using larger chunks.
  */





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux