* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:32:02PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > The .rst files still read like text files, right? > > Like a harder to read text file for no gains. I just looked through a couple of RST files in Documentation/, and they look like perfectly readable text files to me. Some of the formatting details are arguably 'special' and can be broken via "text edits" without being aware of the RST markup relevance - but I don't think it's a problem for RST-unaware developers to break that markup, the Documentation/ folks have been rather generous and flexible in fixing those up, in addition to fixing all the typos as well. So I'd be cautiously in favor of the RST conversion, assuming I don't get yelled at if I break the markup. ;-) Thanks, Ingo
