On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:47:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 12:23 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:43:16AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > The documentation for Co-developed-by is a bit light on details, e.g. it > > > doesn't explicitly state that: > > > > > > - Multiple Co-developed-by tags are perfectly acceptable > > > - Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by must be paired together > > > - SOB ordering should still follow standard sign-off procedure > > While I still think co-developed-by: is unnecessary and > almost none of the existing uses of this have this > sequence of "Co-developed-by: <name/email>" followed directly > by "Signed-off-by: <same name/email>", here's a possible > checkpatch addition for it. Tested-by: Tobin C. Harding <tobin@xxxxxxxxxx> Catches missing SOB of co-developer. Hope this helps, Tobin.
