Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:53:18 -0400
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, X86 <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, corbet@xxxxxxx, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, kanth.ghatraju@xxxxxxxxxx, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ross John Philipson <ross.philipson@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <018B6986-0C7F-4C76-88ED-1548BC77E5AA@zytor.com>
References: <20190311150423.15979-1-ross.philipson@oracle.com> <20190311150423.15979-2-ross.philipson@oracle.com> <018B6986-0C7F-4C76-88ED-1548BC77E5AA@zytor.com>

.. snip..
>
> Double NAK – I'm in a meeting right now but with clarify shortly.

Would it help if we had a meeting to brainstorm an acceptable solution?
Thank you.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol
  - From: hpa

References:
- [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] Secure Launch boot protocol
  - From: Ross Philipson
- [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol
  - From: Ross Philipson
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol
  - From: hpa

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers for making it easy to extend the kernel
Next by Date: [PATCH] doc: add translation disclaimer
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]