Suspicious RCU usage messages are reported as warnings.
Fixes: a5dd63efda3d07b5 ("lockdep: Use "WARNING" tag on lockdep splats")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
---
And before that, they were printed as errors, which was also never
reflected in the documentation...
---
Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt
index 9423b633526d14df..9c015976b174123f 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ being the real world and all that.
So let's look at an example RCU lockdep splat from 3.0-rc5, one that
has long since been fixed:
-===============================
-[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
--------------------------------
+=============================
+WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
+-----------------------------
block/cfq-iosched.c:2776 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
--
2.17.1
