On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:43:23 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > AFAIK we never had a isa_virt_to_phys, it always was > isa_virt_to_bus. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/DMA-ISA-LPC.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-ISA-LPC.txt b/Documentation/DMA-ISA-LPC.txt > index 8c2b8be6e45b..b1ec7b16c21f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/DMA-ISA-LPC.txt > +++ b/Documentation/DMA-ISA-LPC.txt > @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ Address translation > ------------------- > > To translate the virtual address to a bus address, use the normal DMA > -API. Do _not_ use isa_virt_to_phys() even though it does the same > -thing. The reason for this is that the function isa_virt_to_phys() > +API. Do _not_ use isa_virt_to_bus() even though it does the same > +thing. The reason for this is that the function isa_virt_to_bus() > will require a Kconfig dependency to ISA, not just ISA_DMA_API which > is really all you need. Remember that even though the DMA controller > has its origins in ISA it is used elsewhere. Applied, thanks. jon
