On Monday, February 11, 2019 12:54:11 PM CET Vinod Koul wrote: > On 08-02-19, 16:30, Federico Vaga wrote: > > It clarifies that the DMA description pointer returned by > > `dmaengine_prep_*` function should not be used after submission. > > > > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/client.rst | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/client.rst > > b/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/client.rst index > > fbbb2831f29f..d728e50105eb 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/client.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/client.rst > > > > @@ -168,6 +168,13 @@ The details of these operations are: > > dmaengine_submit() will not start the DMA operation, it merely adds > > it to the pending queue. For this, see step 5, > > dma_async_issue_pending. > > > > + .. note:: > > + > > + After calling ``dmaengine_submit()`` the submitted transfer > > descriptor + (``struct dma_async_tx_descriptor``) belongs to the DMA > > engine. + Consequentially, the client must consider invalid the > > pointer to that > Consequently I'm not a native speaker but consequentially and consequently should be synonymous. As fa as I understood. but I do not mind to change it if you think is better. > > + descriptor. > > + > > Applied after fixing the typo and added tag as Documentation: dmaengine... I used doc to make the string shorter > > > 5. Issue pending DMA requests and wait for callback notification > > > > The transactions in the pending queue can be activated by calling the
