On 03. Jan (Thursday) v 14:53:38 -0600 2019, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:04 PM Otto Sabart <ottosabart@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The primecell.txt and cpus.txt files were converted into YAML. This
> > patch updates old references with new ones.
> >
> > Fixes: d3c207eeb905 ("dt-bindings: arm: Convert primecell binding to json-schema")
> > Fixes: 672951cbd1b7 ("dt-bindings: arm: Convert cpu binding to json-schema")
> > Signed-off-by: Otto Sabart <ottosabart@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > As suggested by Jon Corbet, I am *resending* this patch once again to
> > correct maintainers. There are no changes in the code since my previous
> > e-mail.
>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl so you get the right lists too.
>
> >
> > Please review.
>
> Am I supposed to apply? I don't have a clue because I've only gotten patch 3.
>
Hello Rob,
the thing is I messed up and I sent this series of patches to Jon and
linux-doc list only.
Unfortunately these patches touch multiple subsystems so I now have to
get them to correct maintainers.
What is the best thing I should do now? Should I resend (with "RESEND
PATCH" prefix in subject) *whole* series of patches to right maintainers
and lists returned by get_maintainer.pl?
In my case this scripts returns ~60 names and lists. I suppose it is not
the right thing to spam all of them... or is it?
Thank you for your time.
Ota
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
