On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:19:33AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-12-04 23:00:46) > > But that won't solve the issue if we don't do "dirty hacks" in driver. > > The devm interface still only gets the device-pointer, not the DT node > > as argument. And if DT node for device is NULL (like in MFD cases) - > > then there is no parent node, only parent device with a node. For plain > > of_clk_add_provider() the driver can just give the parent's node pointer > > in cases where it knows it is the parent who has the provider data in > > DT. But our original problem is in devm interfaces. > > > > I was misunderstanding the MFD design. Should still work though, so I > squashed this into the patch to clean things up a bit. Does this work > for you? This looks good to me. Especially changing the of_is_clk_provider to get_clk_provider_node which allows to remove some repetition. If you apply this then I will drop my patch from the series. Just please let me know. I will cook version 7 of the series at Friday - tomorrow is the independence day in Finland and I'll be offline =) Thanks! > > ------8<----- > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > index bb689161f0f5..6ff852bda892 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > @@ -3893,9 +3893,23 @@ static void devm_of_clk_release_provider(struct device *dev, void *res) > of_clk_del_provider(*(struct device_node **)res); > } > > -static int of_is_clk_provider(struct device_node *np) > +/* > + * We allow a child device to use its parent device as the clock provider node > + * for cases like MFD sub-devices where the child device driver wants to use > + * devm_*() APIs but not list the device in DT as a sub-node. > + */ > +static struct device_node *get_clk_provider_node(struct device *dev) > { > - return !!of_find_property(np, "#clock-cells", NULL); > + struct device_node *np, *parent_np; > + > + np = dev->of_node; > + parent_np = dev->parent ? dev->parent->of_node : NULL; > + > + if (!of_find_property(np, "#clock-cells", NULL)) > + if (of_find_property(parent_np, "#clock-cells", NULL)) > + np = parent_np; > + > + return np; > } > > /** > @@ -3920,17 +3934,12 @@ int devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(struct device *dev, > struct device_node **ptr, *np; > int ret; > > - np = dev->of_node; > - > - if (!of_is_clk_provider(dev->of_node)) > - if (of_is_clk_provider(dev->parent->of_node)) > - np = dev->parent->of_node; > - > ptr = devres_alloc(devm_of_clk_release_provider, sizeof(*ptr), > GFP_KERNEL); > if (!ptr) > return -ENOMEM; > > + np = get_clk_provider_node(dev); > ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, get, data); > if (!ret) { > *ptr = np; > @@ -3981,13 +3990,8 @@ static int devm_clk_provider_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data) > void devm_of_clk_del_provider(struct device *dev) > { > int ret; > - struct device_node *np; > - > - np = dev->of_node; > + struct device_node *np = get_clk_provider_node(dev); > > - if (!of_is_clk_provider(dev->of_node)) > - if (of_is_clk_provider(dev->parent->of_node)) > - np = dev->parent->of_node; > ret = devres_release(dev, devm_of_clk_release_provider, > devm_clk_provider_match, np); > > -- Matti Vaittinen ROHM Semiconductors ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then, he vanished ~~~